Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.

neels has posted comments on this change by neels. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/37882?usp=email )

Change subject: ctrl, hnbgw: access rate counter groups by given ID instead of 
index
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS2:
> you are missing the use of array indexes in this API verifying rate counters 
> via the ctrl interface. […]
I thought some more about this, and a nicer API would actually be one where the 
object identification is also part of the array entry. It could be a string, 
then callers could enter "msc.0" or "hnb.by_name.A1B2C3".

That would be nice, but I currently prefer not to spend time on our testing API 
cosmetics, and just use this patch that is quickest to success.

There is another compound to this: when we revert this patch to osmo-hnbgw
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/38002
then the object identification behavior does not change, and we don't currently 
need these patches here applied at all to fix our test suite.

(The general mismatch of using "obj.N" for volatile objects still exists, but 
it would not show in the test suite, because osmo-hnbgw will always snap back 
to hnb.0.)



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/37882?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I70e74e7554482df67aa1d90bc04314124dea444f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 37882
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 21:41:20 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <[email protected]>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>

Reply via email to