Attention is currently required from: osmith.

pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38469?usp=email )

Change subject: ggsn: Introduce test TC_pdp4(6)_act_deact_mtu
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(3 comments)

File ggsn_tests/GGSN_Tests.ttcn:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38469/comment/9d88e1e9_a67c449f?usp=email
 :
PS3, Line 248:          f_vty_transceive(GGSNVTY, "apn internet");
> "apn internet" is in "all" and "v4_only" configs, see the confmerge files 
> here: […]
Hmm I copied this from f_vty_set_gpdu_txseq(), which seems to be executed on 
all tests, are you sure about what you say?
Maybe it needs to be fixed there too?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38469/comment/c1b0d58b_be7f480b?usp=email
 :
PS3, Line 2360:                         execute(TC_pdp4_act_deact_mtu());
> wrap in `if (m_ggsn_impl == GGSN_IMPL_OSMOCOM) {`, and same below for 
> `TC_pdp46_act_deact_mtu`, sinc […]
the test is expected to be run for open5gs too (it supports sending MTU), but 
it's true I need to wrap the vty functions in GGSN_IMPL_OSMOCOM.


File library/GTPv1C_Templates.ttcn:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38469/comment/80fc9502_4f125fc8?usp=email
 :
PS3, Line 1229:
> unrelated change
Acknowledged



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/38469?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2ceb76a3a07b44f69937c9f5a040482320bca377
Gerrit-Change-Number: 38469
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: osmith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:01:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <[email protected]>

Reply via email to