Attention is currently required from: Hoernchen.

osmith has posted comments on this change by Hoernchen. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ccid-firmware/+/42330?usp=email )

Change subject: fw source: force reformat once and for all
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS1:
The approach I've taken with checkpatch (from linux.git) and how it is 
configured for Osmocom repositories is, that it should only complain about 
things that are clearly wrong. So it should rather *not* complain about 
something that may be right or may not be, than annoy the users with unhelpful 
errors. This is now working in what seems like 95% of all cases or so (I'm 
subscribed to the "lint errors" jenkins feed and checking regularly if it is 
complaining for wrong reasons and look into it, adjust it as it makes sense).

Could you configure clang-format to do this too? Otherwise we might want to 
reconsider if clang-format is a good fit for our linting requirements.

I'd also be interested in what advantages clang-format gives you. There are 
some downsides to having two tools, they will probably always disagree on some 
things, we need to maintain an additional config and the reporting isn't inline 
as gerrit comments when compared to how we have it set up for checkpatch now.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ccid-firmware/+/42330?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ccid-firmware
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iacc086bb566551225e7a21b639a1ad2ec257484f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 42330
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Hoernchen <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: lynxis lazus <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Attention: Hoernchen <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:42:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No

Reply via email to