Harald Welte has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9671 )

Change subject: large refactoring: use FSMs for lchans; add inter-BSC HO
......................................................................


Patch Set 28:

(1 comment)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/9671/28/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c
File src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/9671/28/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c@352
PS28, Line 352:         {
> @laforge, your opinion is against these inner scopes, but I don't really see 
> a need to remove them. […]
it's just something I've never seen in the kernel, and we use kernel coding 
style in Osmocom.  So my argument is "consistency with existing code base and 
documented coding style". Yes, "if" there was an if, I wouldn't flag it.

we also add another indent level without any need for it, reducing the usable 
part of the line.

A quick look at the function without reading it from top to bottom makes me 
think this is some kind of condition/branch/loop due to that extra indent, only 
to then discover no, this is normal, un-conditional "main body" of the function.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/9671
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I82e3f918295daa83274a4cf803f046979f284366
Gerrit-Change-Number: 9671
Gerrit-PatchSet: 28
Gerrit-Owner: Neels Hofmeyr <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 05:34:30 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-HasLabels: No

Reply via email to