Vadim Yanitskiy has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/13708 )

Change subject: common/oml.c: refactor Get Attribute Response message generation
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/13708/1/src/common/oml.c
File src/common/oml.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/13708/1/src/common/oml.c@194
PS1, Line 194: static inline int handle_attrs_trx(struct msgb *msg, const 
struct gsm_bts_trx *trx,
> in terms of naming, this could be 'out' or 'msg_out' or 'resp' to indicate 
> clearly that it's the out […]
Good point. I think it makes more sense to rename the symbol itself, as we 
don't actually 'handle' any attributes on the BTS. A proper self-explaining 
symbol name would be 'encode_attrs_trx' or 'put_attrs_trx'.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/13708/1/src/common/oml.c@214
PS1, Line 214:                  /* Push this tag to the list of unreported 
attributes */
> what are "unreported" attributes?  I think you can report somethng, but how 
> can you un-report it aga […]
It's my poor English ;) Though this word can be seen in the existing code of 
both OsmoBSC and OsmoBTS. The specs. are using 'non-reported' term.

This is about OML attributes that are not supported by the MO. As per 3GPP TS 
52.021, if an attribute is not supported, it shall be included in the Get 
Attribute response anyway, as a part of 'non-reported' attribute list.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/13708
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I349447a43bce360f59e0c6b435906c65167d158b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 13708
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Vadim Yanitskiy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder (1000002)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vadim Yanitskiy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:07:39 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-HasLabels: No

Reply via email to