lynxis lazus has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/15171 )

Change subject: sgsn: introduce f_send_l3() to allow one function for Gb & Iu
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(3 comments)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/15171/2/sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn
File sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/15171/2/sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn@525 
PS2, Line 525: function f_send_l3(template (value) PDU_L3_MS_SGSN l3_mo, 
integer gb_index := 0, boolean initial := false) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr {
> May have more sense to have an array of initial states (boolean) in 
> BSSGP_ConnHdlr with size equal t […]
good idea. @laforge, what do you think about this?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/15171/2/sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn@644
PS2, Line 644:                          var IntegrityProtectionAlgorithm 
uia_chosen := 0; /*standard_UMTS_integrity_algorithm_UIA1;*/
> why is this commented?
0 means UIA1. I'll change the comment to be more specific


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/15171/2/sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn@646
PS2, Line 646:                          
//BSSAP.receive(tr_RANAP_CommonId(imsi_hex2oct(g_pars.imsi)));
> why is this commented out? because sgsn should send it but it doesn't?
there is a seperate patch for this later in the chain.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/15171
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If47ad2be459ca7b87d9071d9ff020a51821e4433
Gerrit-Change-Number: 15171
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: lynxis lazus <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 18:44:08 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to