neels has posted comments on this change. ( 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21164 )

Change subject: bts: add repeated acch mode flags + vty config
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(4 comments)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21164/3//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21164/3//COMMIT_MSG@10
PS3, Line 10: a one byte flag is sent
this patch does not send anything, all i can see is an unused vty config 
option. please hint at the patch where this has functional effects


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21164/3/include/osmocom/bsc/bts.h
File include/osmocom/bsc/bts.h:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21164/3/include/osmocom/bsc/bts.h@485
PS3, Line 485:  struct abis_rsl_osmo_rep_acch_cap repeated_acch_capability_bts;
(this is a member of struct gsm_bts, redundant to also name the member *_bts)


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21164/3/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c
File src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21164/3/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c@2646
PS3, Line 2646:                 vty_out(vty, "%% repeated ACCH not supported by 
this BTS%s",
would be good to add the BTS number: during program startup, you'd read a lone 
"this BTS" and wouldn't know which one. Same below.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21164/3/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c@2651
PS3, Line 2651:         if (argv[0][0] == 'c') {
i also did it like this some years back and got the code review that i should 
rather use a strcmp() -- doing that ever since.



--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/21164
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit 
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I083eaa2c30478912426e9c24a506f0b88836e190
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21164
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: neels <[email protected]>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:28:59 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Reply via email to