David, I think the best thing is to forget about the previous messages & 'start' again. AFAIK I have never clicked the 'discard' link. From now on until further notice, I'll send (using Evolution) using gmail only - so let's what happens
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 16:30 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 15:36 +0000, John Rose wrote: > > Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:00:55 +0000 > > Message-ID: > > <CACns58WO=-HjgU0cYtGdptKr7+bMfH7iYA=vbfryyg68fnb...@mail.gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: Naive questions: RTMP packets & output > > From: John Rose <[email protected]> > > I looked up this one. It arrived at my systems, and you received a > response almost immediately thereafter: > > 2012-01-23 17:00:58 +0000 1RpNGM-0008Kx-4R <= [email protected] > H=mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177] P=esmtps X=TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128 > S=3277 id=CACns58WO=-HjgU0cYtGdptKr7+bMfH7iYA=vbfryyg68fnb...@mail.gmail.com > 2012-01-23 17:00:58 +0000 1RpNGM-0008Kx-4R => get_iplayer > <[email protected]> R=mailman_here_router T=mailman_transport > 2012-01-23 17:00:58 +0000 1RpNGM-0008Kx-4R Completed > > 2012-01-23 17:01:01 +0000 1RpNGP-0008Lh-6T <= > [email protected] H=localhost (merlin.infradead.org) > [::1] P=esmtp S=1331 > [email protected] > 2012-01-23 17:01:02 +0000 1RpNGP-0008Lh-6T => [email protected] > R=lookuphost T=verp_smtp H=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [74.125.113.26] > X=TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128 C="250 2.0.0 OK 1327338062 i8si6126435vdv.59" > 2012-01-23 17:01:02 +0000 1RpNGP-0008Lh-6T Completed > > It does look like it was trapped for moderation, for whatever reason. > Mailman's logs say (they're local time and the machine is in Toronto), > so 5 hours difference): > > Jan 23 12:00:59 2012 (14259) get_iplayer post from [email protected] > held, > message-id=<CACns58WO=-HjgU0cYtGdptKr7+bMfH7iYA=vbfryyg68fnb...@mail.gmail.com>: > Message has a suspicious header > > The confusing thing is that it's gone from the moderation queue now. I > don't know how that would have happened unless you'd clicked the > 'discard' link you get in the response email. > > I did actually find the message in the spam filter's cache, where it > keeps messages for training. A close inspection seems to indicate that > it was a reply, but it lacked In-Reply-To: and References: threading > headers. How did you actually post that? Whatever you did, something > broke the normal reply process... > _______________________________________________ get_iplayer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
