My thoughts exactly.

And even when the file is 320kbps AAC I can't personally see why anyone would 
transcode it to 128kbps MP3. Storage sizes today make this kind of file size 
reduction meaningless for audio.
-- 
Owen Smith <[email protected]>
Cambridge, UK

On 15 Jun 2014, at 02:49, Christopher Woods <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> But -- aren't the R4X programmes AAC 128kbps, which is subjectively higher 
> quality than a 128kbps MP3 to begin with? Transcoding would just lose audible 
> quality for no filesize advantage...
> 
> On 12 June 2014 09:02:43 "Chris Marriott" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> If it's a voice programme, rather than music, a useful option is the 
>> "aactomp3" flag, which will transcode at 128kbps, no matter what the 
>> original is. I use this very successfully for all the drama programmes I 
>> record from Radio 4 Extra. Of course, for music, you may wish to retain the 
>> 320kbps for the higher quality.
>> 
>> Chris

_______________________________________________
get_iplayer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer

Reply via email to