Blasted mailing list, I sent the message below as a personal reply, AGAIN. I simply cannot get my brain to accept how this list works. I'm on half a dozen other mailing lists all of which work the other way round ie. replies go to the list. Mutter. -- Owen Smith <[email protected]> Cambridge, UK
On 8 Nov 2014, at 12:54, Owen Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > This is decoding a lossy format (AAC), not encoding. Provided there are no > digital volume controls or similar being applied, the results should be > identical regardless of which software is used to decode it. It's the > definition of AAC that dictates what an AAC stream decodes to. Encoding yes > there is plenty of room for different implementations to produce different > results, but not decoding. Otherwise it wouldn't be a correct decode of the > AAC. > -- > Owen Smith <[email protected]> > Cambridge, UK > > On 8 Nov 2014, at 12:26, Jim Lesurf <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks, I'll look at the above. One of the things I'm curious about is the >> relative performance (in terms of quality, etc) of ffmpeg versus avcodec. I >> come to this from being a long term user of ffmpeg, but knowing nothing >> about the forking or its effects. Given my past I tend to go for using >> ffmpeg as my first intent. But would/will change if it is advantageous. >> >> Jim >> _______________________________________________ get_iplayer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
