> Not much point in going much further on that point. But over the years I > have learned that speculations about the cause or reason for something are > often helpful in being able to get something sorted out. So I don't agree > with you. We''ll have to differ in our views on this.
I think so far we have worked out quite a lot about the problems through this "meaningless noise" as S Carr puts it. >S Carr <sjc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hats off to dinky for the work, but please realise get_iplayer is a > > hack, a workaround, call it whatever you want, it's not a legitimate way > > to "consume" iPlayer content, those apps the BBC produce will have a lot > > more error checking and recovery in them than get_iplayer does, so all > > this speculation on how things work is just meaningless noise. You don't have to be involved if you don't want to be. _______________________________________________ get_iplayer mailing list get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
