Hi Vangelis, > I have never claimed to be infallible and have welcome anybody who > have spotted something out of place in my posts to say so, for it to > be fixed...
No, no, I agree. I hope it didn't come across that I was complaining. I have scripts to `get', `info', etc., that kick off get_iplayer with these options that I decided on long ago, and your prompting of why I was using them made me dig up what they were doing, and whether get_iplayer had changed underneath them so they no longer had the intended effect. > and porting customisations to the new script from 3.00.0 :-( ). I'm just about to do the same. Are you aware of the patch(1) program? Given the original file A, I make some changes and save it as B. The upstream author then releases A2. I make a "unified diff" that describes my changes between A and B with the diff(1) program's -u option. I then ask patch to apply those edits to A2 to create B2. With luck, it can do all the edits automatically. The bits it can't fix, perhaps B and A2 have both changed the same line in A, it marks with comments in B2 so one fixes them manually. I'm just about to apply my change to 3.01; it changes the `:' in search results to `>' if the programme is already in the PVR. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy _______________________________________________ get_iplayer mailing list get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
