In article <[email protected]>, Dave
Lambley <[email protected]> wrote:

> I imagine you could do a better job of decoding it than was ever
> possible in 1977.

Possibly, although I suspect that what got encoded and into what listeners
had might haveoften  been changed by other imperfections along the way.
Thus even the 'official' decoding definition might not be optimum.

Jim

-- 
Electronics  https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio  http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
biog http://jcgl.orpheusweb.co.uk/history/ups_and_downs.html
Audio Misc  http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html


_______________________________________________
get_iplayer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer

Reply via email to