Dear Yves,
A question on interpolated fem if I may. I need to use interpolated fem with a
vectorial problem, something that getfem currently does not allow.
Some time ago I was already asking you about this and you suggested to
reformulate my problem into a scalar one, so I won't need the vector feature.
I have a code now, which I'm, say, "enhancing" with interpolated fem and
reformulation of this code in scalar terms would be a considerable time
investment.
Therefore, would you be kind to briefly explain how difficult it is to develop
a vectorial interpolated fem and what steps need to be undertaken.
Despite my experience with getfem, I still have problems understanding the
internal structures, as the ones you have in getfem_interpolated_fem.h/cc.
Is this, by any chance, anything you would be planning to include in the next
versions of getfem?
Best regards,
Andriy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andriy Andreykiv,
Postdoctoral researcher
Leiden University Medical Center | Delft University of Technology
Biomechanics and Imaging Gr. | Fundamentals and Microsystems Gr.
Department of Orthopaedics | Faculty of 3mE
Room J09-127 | Room 8B-3-22
PO Box 9600 | Mekelweg 2
2300 RC Leiden | 2628 CD Delft
The Netherlands | The Netherlands
tel. +31-(0)71-5261566 | tel. +31-(0)15-2786818
fax +31-(0)71-5266743 | fax +31-(0)15-2789475
e-mail: [email protected] | e-mail: [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007 19:14, Andriy Andreykiv a écrit :
> Dear Yves,
>
> What I want to do with interpolated fem is the following. I want to
> simulate a composite material (something like a car distribution belt),
> where the matrix of the composite is simulated with hexahedral elements
> while the fibers, that enforce the composite material are simulated with
> trusses. I want those trusses not to be conformal with the mesh of the
> matrix material, hence I want to impose a weak constraint that displacement
> of the fibers should be equal to the displacement of the matrix material
> in the location where those trusses fibers cross the matrix (this way I
> would attach the fibers inside the matrix material). Hence, again this is
> conceptually similar to fictitious domain method for fluid-structure
> interection, where velocity of the fluid on the boundary of the structure
> should be equal the velocity of the structure and this constraint is
> imposed in a weak sence.
> I probably can reformulate my vectorial problem into a set of
> scalar problems and then use interpolated fem, and then assemble a
> vectorial problem again. Would that be a solution?
>I suppose you need the mass matrix beetween the two elements ? (because, if
>you only need a basic interpolation, in the sense of Lagrange elements, you
>can have the interpolation matrix without using interpolated fems).
>Yes, you can indeed try to reformulate your problem as a set of scalar
>problems and use the scalar interpolated fem. However, if you use only scalar
>element (not intric vectorial ones), the adaptation of interpolated fems to
>vectorial fems should not be to much complicated. If you need, i can have a
>look to this when i will not be too busy.
>Yves.
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yves Renard ([email protected]) tel : (33) 04.72.43.80.11
> Pole de Mathematiques, fax : (33) 04.72.43.85.29
> Institut Camille Jordan - CNRS UMR 5208
> INSA de Lyon, Universite de Lyon
> 20, rue Albert Einstein
> 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, FRANCE
> http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~renard
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Getfem-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users
