Hi, this is the answer Yves had given to a similar question of mine:
> Normally, you should only work with dof number, not point number. > A point is a vertex of an element in the mesh. You do not have necessary > a correspondance between vertex of the mesh and dofs (think to non-coformal > P1 for instance). I hope it helps. Something else that I consider as relevant is a snippet given in: bgeot_kdtree.h see: http://download.gna.org/getfem/doc/getfem_reference/bgeot__kdtree_8h_source.html which shows a way to implement a mapping between dofs and point numbers. In my case I had finally found a solution which didn't require this mapping. Best Regards Kostas On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Roman Putanowicz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I haven't found a function that would give DOFs associated with > given node. Is this because there was no reason to write such > function or are there some subtle issues related to writing it? > > One problem I can see is that a node can be adjacent to elements > (convexes) that have different finite element methods set on them. > That would require iteration on convexes adjacent to a node and > sorting somehow the DOFs. > > Regards, > > Roman > -- > Roman Putanowicz, PhD < [email protected] > > Institute for Computational Civil Engng (L-5) > Dept. of Civil Engng, Cracow Univ. of Technology > www.l5.pk.edu.pl, tel. +48 12 628 2569, fax 2034 > > _______________________________________________ > Getfem-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users > _______________________________________________ Getfem-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users
