Hi! I'm not using a mesh.transformation(M), this is a complete test program 
that 
reproduces it (copied from the documentation):

************************
getfem::mesh mymesh;

bgeot::base_node org(0.0, 0.0, 0.0);

std::vector<bgeot::base_small_vector> vect(3);
vect[0] = bgeot::base_small_vector(1.0, 0.0, 0.0);
vect[1] = bgeot::base_small_vector(0.0, 1.0, 0.0);
vect[2] = bgeot::base_small_vector(0.0, 0.0, 1.0);

std::vector<int> ref(3); ref[0] = ref[1] = ref[2] = 10;

getfem::parallelepiped_regular_simplex_mesh(mymesh, 3, org, vect.begin(), 
ref.begin());

const int numPoints = mymesh.points_index().size();

std::cout << mymesh.points()[numPoints-1] << std::endl;
*************************

At the end it prints the coordinates of the last point, which I expected to be 
[1, 1, 1] since those are the limits set in 'vect', but I get:

[10, 10, 10]

I compile it with g++ 4.4.4 (no compilation warnings):

g++ Test.cpp -o Test.elf -Wall -Wextra -O3  -lgetfem

and use GetFEM++ 4.1 in the current Debian Sid OS, and a 64bit computer with a 
Intel T4400 dual core processor.

- Torquil

On 24/09/10 09:14, Yves Renard wrote:
>
> Dear Torquil,
>
> No, this really generates a mesh on the cube [0,1]^3. Are you sure you do not
> have an instruction
>
> mesh.transformation(M);
>
> after the mesh generation  (like in tests/laplacian.cc) ?
>
> On jeudi 23 septembre 2010, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> In the "Short User Documentation" it is written that to generate a 10x10x10
>> mesh on the unit cube [0,1]^3, the following code would work:
>>
>> getfem::mesh mymesh;
>> bgeot::base_node org(0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
>> std::vector<bgeot::base_small_vector>  vect(3);
>> vect[0] = bgeot::base_small_vector(1.0, 0.0, 0.0);
>> vect[1] = bgeot::base_small_vector(0.0, 1.0, 0.0);
>> vect[2] = bgeot::base_small_vector(0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
>> std::vector<int>  ref(3);
>> ref[0] = ref[1] = ref[2] = 10;
>> getfem::parallelepiped_regular_simplex_mesh(mymesh, 3, org, vect.begin(),
>> ref.begin());
>>
>> But when I print the coordinates of the points in this mesh, i.e.
>> mymesh.points(), I get component values not within [0,1], but in [0,10].
>>
>> Is this a mistake in the documentation, or do these values not represent
>> the coordinates of the points (but instead "scaled coordinates")?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Torquil
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Getfem-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users
>
>

_______________________________________________
Getfem-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users

Reply via email to