Dear Natanael Lanz, GetFEM++ can currently use MUMPS as a parallel direct solver if compiled with --enable-paralevel=2, see http://download.gna.org/getfem/html/homepage/userdoc/parallel.html . I guess an interface for the parallel version of SUPERLU would be similar to the available interface for MUMPS. However, I am wondering why not just using MUMPS? As far as I understand it is the most mature of the sparse direct solvers that one can get for free.
Best regards Kostas On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Lanz Natanael <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Did ever anybody try to use getfem with a different version of superlu as > the included one? > > > > I tried to compile getfem it with the superlu_mt version for parallel > computation by disabling superlu with the option –disable-superlu and > giving the path of superlu_mt libraries in SUPERLU_LIBS before compiling > but that always gives an error. > > > > What also doesn’t work is the attempt to use the two superlu versions in > parallel, as many functions have the same name in both libraries. > > > > And compiling getfem++ completely without superlu by just typing > –disable-superlu also does not seem to work. > > > > Does anybody know, how this could be done? Parallel computation would be > very useful in getfem for solving. > > > > Thank you for your help! > > > > Best regards, > > > > Natanael Lanz > > MSc Masch. Ing. ETH > > > > IWF ETH Zürich > > Technoparkstrasse 1 > > PFA E82 > > CH-8005 Zürich > > > > [email protected] > > www.iwf.mavt.ethz.ch > > Tel. +41 44 6325714 <+41%2044%20632%2057%2014> > > Mob. +41 79 5862958 <+41%2079%20586%2029%2058> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Getfem-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users > >
_______________________________________________ Getfem-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/getfem-users
