Dear Yves , Thank you for your reply. I explain my situation.
I'm solving transient problem by using getfem's Newmark-theme. There is multiple variable to solve in Newmark-theme and have a relation in one way. So I enable/disable the variable and solve for each variable in time step. In that situation,I had a question that shift_variable is working also on disable variables or not. I now could understand that concept of enable/disable is only for solving not for shift variables. I think adding the explanation about it to document is redundancy. I withdraw my opinion. Thank you for reading. Best Regards,Tetsuo 2019年2月22日(金) 4:33 Yves Renard <[email protected]>: > > > Dear Tetsuo, > > What do you exactly mean by "shift also enable variables" ? > This method copy the value of the current version of a variable declared in a > time integration scheme to the variable (data in fact) which stores the value > at the previous time step. > > The fact that the variable is enabled or disabled do not have to change the > behavior, I think. > > By the way, this mecanism of time integration scheme is not used a lot ... > > Best Regards, > > Yves > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tetsuo Koyama" <[email protected]> > To: "getfem-users" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 1:16:35 PM > Subject: [Getfem-users] function shift_variables_for_time_integration seem to > shift the enable variables. > > Dear GetFEM++ project > > Sorry for my frequently ask questions. > I guess that "shift_variables_for_time_integration" method in Model > object will shift also enable variables.(I checked it only by source > and didn't check it in test.) > Is it the intended specification? If that so, I will add it to > document. If it is not the intended I will fix the source. > > Could you have a comment ? > > Best Regard Tetsuo,
