Hi Kevin, I've tried using getpaid about 2 years ago & ended up going for a simpler solution.
More recently, I was at the Plone 2010 conference in October & in the following talk (External E-commerce and Plone playing ) given by Sasha Vincic, he makes a case for not adding products to Plone but rather adding Services in order to smooth your future upgrade path. http://plone.blip.tv/file/4317834/ (he starts talking at 05:40) ( See some more notes on the talk here: http://www.rickhurst.co.uk/2010/10/31/plone-conference-2010-day-2/) I'd like to know if anyone on this mailing list disagrees with Sasha's general approach/line-of-argument? regards, Daniel On Mar 11, 3:14 pm, gmail <movieextras.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What is the status of PloneGetPaid. It seems to have gone comatose. > > I have just been experimenting with customising it for my application. > It is quite impressive. It also worked when I installed it on Plone 4.0.3. > > However, I am a bit worried about the state of the project... > > The plonegetpaid.com website is gone. > The user contributed docs > onhttp://plone.org/products/getpaid/documentationare all years old. > Few docs in the wiki are under a year old. > There are few checkins under subversion. > 114 open issues. > > Before I invest time and effort implementing my requirements, is this > project viable? There are 200 subscribers to this list. Are you still > using PloneGetPaid? Have you switched to Satchmo, LFS or something else? > > Thanks > > Kevin -- GetPaid for Plone: http://www.plonegetpaid.com (overview info) | http://code.google.com/p/getpaid (code and issue tracker) You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "getpaid-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to getpaid-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to getpaid-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/getpaid-dev?hl=en?hl=en
