PLEASE GET ME OFF THE LIST OR I'LL HAVE TO START SPAMMING THE LIST WITH ADS
I'VE ALREADY TRIED USING REAL SOFTWARE'S LIST MANAGER 5 TIMES AND IT IS NOT
WORKING.
GET YOUR BUZZBOX411 NOW
ONLY 14.95 A MONTH
FOR 19.99 YOU CAN GET UNLIMITED CALLS TO EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA
=======================
|
| Shayaan Siddiqui
|
=======================
Get your own BuzzBox line, starting at $14.95 a month. Click to
http://www.buzzbox411.com
From: Arnaud Nicolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Getting Started <gettingstarted@lists.realsoftware.com>
To: Getting Started <gettingstarted@lists.realsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Property does not exist
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:15:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com ([209.198.132.125]) by
bay0-mc3-f2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, 6
Sep 2006 14:16:10 -0700
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])by
lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTPid 2B59914AFE2D; Wed, 6 Sep
2006 16:15:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from tribu.ch (62-2-252-251.static.cablecom.ch [62.2.252.251])by
lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A7D14AFE20for
<gettingstarted@lists.realsoftware.com>;Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:15:53 -0500
(CDT)
Received: from [194.230.217.41] (194.230.217.41) by tribu.ch with
ESMTP(Eudora Internet Mail Server X 3.2.9) for
<gettingstarted@lists.realsoftware.com>; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:15:47 +0200
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt1yTFSuywLql2tIXLHlqN8+vf3xGSN24qU=
X-Original-To: gettingstarted@lists.realsoftware.com
Delivered-To: gettingstarted@lists.realsoftware.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on ns1.relation.ch
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
autolearn=no version=3.1.4
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-BeenThere: gettingstarted@lists.realsoftware.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2006 21:16:11.0203 (UTC)
FILETIME=[AD599930:01C6D1F9]
Le 6 sept. 06 à 23:05 Soir, Terry Ford a écrit:
On Sep 6, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Arnaud Nicolet wrote:
Le 6 sept. 06 à 19:31 Soir, Robert Poland a écrit:
Hi,
In Class1 I have this statement"w=TextWindow"
When I run it I get the error This property does not exist.
I have w=TextWindow set as a property, Global in TextWindow. I thought
that a global property could be accessed from anywhere without a
prefix.
This is true for modules.
For classes and windows, global is named public. (at least in my RB
version).
Would that be 5.5? You don't see anything in the latest releases.
Indeed. Most of the time, I say something which has not changed between
5.5 (the version I keep using) and 2005-2006. This was not the case here.
For example, say you have 2 windows opened (you used w=new win1 twice).
Then how would the compiler knows for which win1
MyWin1Property=2
refers to?
In that case wouldn't 'w' refer to an instance of win1? MyWin1.Property
doesn't exist as far as I can see by this code snippet.
One must remember that if one has multiple windows of the same class name
opened, 'w' will usually refer to the last one cast with the variable
used. You must use other methods to determine which of the win1 windows
you are referring to. Here again, the scope of the variable used is
important.
REALbasic is really good at showing casting errors most of the time but
bad location of these variables can affect the execution of your
application.
My point was to demonstrate why not using MyWin1.MyWin1Property (but only
MyWin1Property was not enough). Well, I may not be able to explain
correctly. It's a shame if I want to try to help.
That seems logical to keep the prefix.
In this case, the class name is useless and it also isn't a prefix. It's
the name of the object or objects you are referring to. The variable that
is cast to Win1 is the point in question.
Still from my example, the prefix I was referring to was not mentioned. I
can be "w", self, or anything. The code MyWin1Property=2 was supposed to
be outside of its parent class.
All I did was to clarify the scope of the variable "w". There really
wasn't enough code to ascertain exactly what was being attempted.
If Robert can provide more detail we might be able to ascertain what he
did that was wrong in his code.
Yes. Seems like I'm tired these days, sorry, it's out of me.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
