"object references and not two sets of objects"
Thanks.
Norman Palardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:08 AM, D P wrote:
> Thank you. Worked.
>
> I do find this to be an odd use of memory resource. I noticed
> that I can still go back and use EditField1(index) and access all
> properties 0 to 81. I now have an array taking up memory and the
> Editfield1(index) in duplicate. Any wise member of the board know
> the rational for the redundancy? Maybe it isn't?
>
> thanks
> Derek
>
> FreeFL
not much memory though as you only have object references and not two
sets of objects
you could even remove your array if you wanted although you'd have to
change your code
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
Search the archives of this list here:
________________________________________________________________
A man's own manner and character is what most becomes him.
- Marcus Cicero.
www.drunkenpoets.com
www.soundtower.com
---------------------------------
All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
