Dennis Ruffer wrote:
> 
> I agree, but until Jorge gets the Fink one done, yours is all people have
> and due to the 1998 config.guess problem with darwin, it is hard to know how
> to build it.  What does Anton want removed from yours?

It wasn't that he wanted anything removed.  Maybe he won't mind
a private
quote from email:

  No.  The binonlydist was meant to be combined with the source
dist to
  produce a bindist (for those who could get the source dist
more easily
  (from a GNU mirror) than a bindist (from our site), and then
run make.
  That's why it does not contain gforth.fi.

  However, it seems that many people did not understand this, so
I have
  concluded that binonlydists are a bad idea and I have not
created them
  for recent releases.

Are you aware of my howto on building 0.5.0 for OS X?

  http://www-personal.umich.edu/~williams/archive/forth/gforth/dir.html

As far as I know, it works fine.  It does not mention that the
build takes advantage of dynamic libs (AFAICT) when dlcompat is
installed, but it works without it anyway.

-- David

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to