Robert Epprecht wrote: > > The main thing missing before the release is an update to the > > documentation. > > I hope you are right here. I do have some strange difficulties running > my 'brew' program on this snapshot. Let's assume it's brews fault, > but I'd like to find that out, to be sure... > > So I try to debug and found some changes in the behaviour of BREAK: > (and maybe of SEE) instead. I can imagine that this is a tribute to > a better compiler (which could render BREAK: and SEE impossible to > behave like before), but it smells a bit buggy to me.
SEE should be ok. Please report all cases where it is not. BREAK: etc. are likely broken by the changes. You might still get them to work in gforth-itc or in "gforth --no-super", but I would not count on it. Maybe Jens wants to fix it, but I don't know if he will get around to doing it soon. > My main concern is not the word BREAK: but I hoped BREAK: would > help me to find out what is going wrong with brew by using it... Use ~~ instead. The reason why I did not notice (or even think of) the brokenness of BREAK: and DBG is that I never use it. I always use ~~ instead. - anton --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
