Ralf Hautkappe wrote: > > i dont understand why there must be a stack underflow ( because ?do takes two > items thats provided through the parameters 2 2 )
In the first Iteration of the outer loop the inner ?DO takes a 2. In the next iteration it takes another stack item, but you did not provide one => stack underflow. But that's a general Forth question, so I would recommend news:comp.lang.forth. - anton --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
