Dennis Ruffer wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Anton Ertl wrote: > > Dennis Ruffer wrote: > >> On Feb 25, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Anton Ertl wrote: > >>> Dennis Ruffer wrote: > >>>> lib.fs is still complaining that "Neither libffi nor ffcall are > >>>> available". ;( > > > > Looking at the code again, I guess that's because lib.fs now checks > > for the shared libraries in a Linux-specific way, rather than checking > > for the primitives. > > I see what you are trying to do. Do you want an OSX alternative?
Not at the moment. I actually need to find a portable way. I hope I'll find something in the libtool stuff. > > Using these commands you get sticky tags for these files (you see it > > with cvs status), so if you ever want to update to the current > > version, you have to get rid of these tags with "cvs update -A" > > I can also just modify it with the older code. That way CVS will > keep track of the fact that I have touched it. If you mean that you change the files to contain the old contents but still make CVS think you started with the newest ones, that's a bad idea. As for keeping track, that's what CVS does through the sticky tags. - anton --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
