> Anton Ertl wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:11:10PM -0500, Josh Grams wrote: >>> In kernel/toolsext.fs, is there a reason why the definition of [ELSE] in >>> [struct]-voc (at line 40) is not immediate? All the others are... >> >> There appears to be, because if I make it immediate, too, Gforth >> breaks. It's unclear to me what the reason is, though. Maybe Bernd >> can shed some light on it. > > As far as I can see, it is immediate, the immediate is just a line > below.
Argh! :) So it is. I guess the formatting threw me off: I didn't notice that there was an `immediate` on the line above [IFDEF]. Sorry about that... --Josh
