Am Sonntag, 12. Januar 2014, 12:23:55 schrieb Sam Putman: > Thank you, that looks like it will work well. Suitably low-level for my > purposes.. > > One question: >buffer-execute doesn't appear to be implemented: > > ag -Q ">buffer-execute" -> > > *66*:\ >buffer-execute ( ... c-addr u1 xt -- ... u2 ) execute xt while the > > *82*:\ pad 0 ['] foo >buffer-execute >r drop ( throw away result of FOO ) > > *84*:\ r@ allocate throw r> 2dup 2>r ['] foo >buffer-execute drop 2r> > > These are all comments. Is this word also available? I would prefer not to > dynamically allocate for this use.
No, it's not available, it's only a suggestion for an alternative interface. -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://bernd-paysan.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
