Anton Ertl <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 10:04:22PM +0200, Bernd Paysan wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 30. April 2019, 17:12:34 CEST schrieb Anton Ertl: >> > What do you think should be the default for .S and ~~: the classic or >> > the smart .S ? >> >> The question on today's net2o chat resulted in 3 votes against the smart .S >> by >> default. > > The same here and on comp.lang.forth. So I guess that we will revert > .S to be classic. > >> In ~~ it's a different question, because in ~~ you can't just type in >> something else to get that something else. > > I also think that ~~ should use the smart .S . > > - anton
I don't see anything wrong with ~~ using smart .S. I just don't want .S to return something that no one that is used to the real .S will expect...
