On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:55:12PM +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > Hi Anton, > > On Tue 13 Feb 2024 at 10:21, Anton Ertl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > SEE-CODE to see the result of dynamic native-code generations: > > thank you for all the information. > > How can I create my own word with a native code definition which would > then be subject to Dynamic Superinstructions inlining? Is it possible > without rebuilding gforth with custom code, e.g. using CODE or ABI-CODE > words?
Only Gforth primitives are integrated into dynamic superinstructions. So you would have to define an additional word in prim, possibly using a gcc asm statement in the C part of the definition. The code also needs to be position-independent. - anton
