> > I have heavy opposition. Most of the top guys are sold on the DRI
> > approach. I personal am not. So my goal is to make a system that will
> > outperform DRI.
> >
>
> That's a not so good news. Hmm... Linus itself is the last instance...
> especially in _contentious_ questions... and his decision is _the_
> decision at all!
> Hmmm... beginning an quarrel and hoping Linus would make the _right_
> decision at the end...??? :)
Well linus doesn't know about these discussions. The other guys like
Steffen Tweedie are opposed to it. They scream preformace is more
important than stability. The way to get it into the kernel is to show
that the code is better. Linus is teh type to say show me the code. If its
good code and it lives up to what its suppose to do. It will go in.
> But I am not sure, if this is the right way to push it for 2.5.x. But it
> could or should the _last_ way we should go to push it... Any comments?
Other the last few months I have gain the respect of most of the kernel
developers. I have helped lay out a new and much better fbcon system for
2.5.x. With this it also has given me some say over things about kernel
policy. Many support my work with fbcon and the future gfx system.
