On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > libmagick ? It's free software, can be used without X, and supports a
> > sheet-load of image formats.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1. Is it generic?
> This is necessary, because the main point about GGI is being _generic_.
AFAIK the one who develops 'zed' www browser doesn't like it for some
reason but still uses it.
It -looks- generic. but it also looks unix-centric...
I haven't looked closer.
> 2. Which distributions comes with libmagick?
> libmagick should come with as many distributions as possible...
It's used by a -large- number of X apps. I actually haven't seen a
distrib come without it (and I've seen a -lot- what with being the local
'expert' *grin*).
G'day, eh? :)
- Teunis
