On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Andreas Beck wrote:
> > How about LDDK (http://www.llp.fu-berlin.de/pool/software/dutil/) for a
> > beginning?
>
> If the _L_ there means _L_inux, then please don't, except for maybe
> borrowing ideas.
Yes. LDDK = Linux Driver Development Kit.
> I want KGI/KGIcon to stay absolutely portable.
Sure. I thought, to use the Driver Development Language (DDL) to write
KGI-drivers. I wanna say, modifying the DDL-Compiler to create KGI-drivers
instead of Linux-Drivers should be much less work than developing that system
from the beginning...
Maybe that some modifications on the DDL itself may be necessary, but as I
said - it is tiny work compared developing that from the beginning.
That's why, I mentioned the LDDK project.
CU,
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
