On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Marcus Sundberg wrote:
> I see no problem with this, and neither should you...
> Knowing whether an extension has been attached is exactly the same
> issue as knowing whether a mode has been set or whether the visual
> has been opened at all, or whether the memory pointed to by your
> program's foobar pointer has actually been allocated. If you want
> to use an extension you attach it after opening the visual, it's
> that simple.
I see your point(er). Is there a way to check if an extension has been
added, like you might check to see if a pointer is NULL?
Would it help to have subclasses created instead? This could be a bit more
expressive and allow for compile time type checking.
--
Lee Brown Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Royal Pain in the Ass
