[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christoph Egger)
> >
> >> it is interesting to note that debian already separate targets on its
> >> distribution. it is the correct thing to do, and that's what the
> >> debian ggi maintainer ends up doing by himself.
> >
> >Sure. But the debian-package is rather old. I recommend to the debian ggi
> >maintainer to update it.
> >
> the one way to make sure ggi is up-to-date in distributions is to make
> it indispensable! 8) i guess this TODO thread will get things going...

well, if I was a debian maintainer of some package, I'd use the latest
stable release as the basis for my debian package, since everything else
would require way too many updates (assuming that there are new cvs checkins
every now and then).

Moral: release often.

Stefan
_______________________________________________________              
              
Stefan Seefeld
Departement de Physique
Universite de Montreal
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________________

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Reply via email to