On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Christoph Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > My suggestion is a directory-tree like this:
> >
> > extensions/
> > extensions/libblt/*
> > extensions/libovl/*
> > extensions/libxmi/*
> > extensions/libgcp/*
> > extensions/libggigl/*
> > misc/
> > misc/libgffd/*
> > misc/libbse/*
> > misc/libgwt/*
> >
> >
> > libggi, libgii, libgg, libwmh and libgic don't have to move to SF,
> > because Andy don't want to loose the history of them.
>
> You mean not right now or never?
Well, I think the time is right now to do it as long as nothing
happens in our GGI-CVS to avoid sync-problems.
> > Comments?
>
> How about the targets? I thought it was decided that targets should be
> released separatly (obvioulsy everybody's not interested in the directX
> target).
The targets are components of the extensions. It was decided that the
_extensions_ are managed separatly as modules.
> Then how about the webpage? is it also moving to SF cvs?
I don't know. IMHO this is not necessary to move them into cvs.
I don't even know, _if_ they move to SF at all.
> By the way, could somebody add me to the member list.
Are you already registered at SF? If yes, then ask Andy or Marcus.
They can add you.
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
