Andreas Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> display/X already contains mode.inc, which is shared by the various X
> targets.
has anyone looked at this code recently? besides not being entirely
correct, the naming of the following functions is inconsistent.
should i fix this as well when i add make_cursor() here?
* int _ggi_x_resize(ggi_visual_t vis, int w, int h, ggi_event *ev);
* static int _GGIgetbpp(ggi_visual *vis);
this is actually static int _GGIgetbpp(ggi_x_priv *priv)
* static int _GGIbasiccheck(ggi_visual *vis,ggi_mode *tm,
XVisualInfo *vinfo);
* int GGI_X_checkmode(ggi_visual *vis,ggi_mode *tm);
* int GGI_X_setmode(ggi_visual *vis,ggi_mode *tm);
* int GGI_X_getmode(ggi_visual *vis,ggi_mode *tm);
there seem to be other non-documented functions as well. what was the
intention of listing these 5? historic reasons? :-)
which of GGI_X, _ggi_x, _GGI is preferred?
--
Tijs van Bakel, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
