On 9 Jul 2001, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
> On 09 Jul 2001 17:29:36 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > On 9 Jul 2001, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
> >
> > > ltconfig is dead with libtool 1.4 and should be removed. libtool.m4,
> > > however, should be added. I'm putting in a patch now.
> >
> > I just tested your CVS changes. When I run autogen.sh I got this
> > warning:
> >
> > configure.in: 42: required file `./ltconfig' not found
>
> I'm just not seeing this.
Uhmm... I hope that you don't forget to run autogen.sh at first, when
you are about testing your changes.
> The only references I can find to ltconfig in the tree are in the
> Changelog.1999. Line 42 of configure.in is an AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
> (which is deprecated and should be AC_PROG_LIBTOOL).
>
> Try the following:
>
> grep for ltconfig in a _clean_ source tree - you shouldn't have it
> except in Changelog.1999. This should verify that your source tree
> doesn't have bogus files.
Yep.
> Check versions on libtool, automake, autoconf:
>
> [tharbaug@phantasm libgii]$ libtool --version
> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4 (1.920 2001/04/24 23:26:18)
> [tharbaug@phantasm libgii]$ automake --version
> automake (GNU automake) 1.4-p2
>
> Copyright (C) 1999, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
> NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE.
>
> Written by Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [tharbaug@phantasm libgii]$ autoconf --version
> Autoconf version 2.13
I get the exact same output.
BTW: When I replace AM_PROG_LIBTOOL by AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as you say
above then I don't get the
configure.in: 42: required file `./ltconfig' not found
message anymore. I get this one instead:
gg/Makefile.am:5: library used but `LIBTOOL' not defined in `configure.in'
CU,
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
