On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Brian S. Julin wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > mode.visible is the top left corner and mode.virt the width and height.
> >
> >
> > Now my questions:
> >
> > Is mode.visible expected to be given in dots or pixels?
> > Is mode.virt expected to be given in dots or pixels?
>
> Pixels, for both, I would say.
That is, what I think, too. But I was not sure, because it is also
possible to have mode.visible in pixels and mode.virt in dots for
resolution independence to the parent visual's mode.
> If we ever do a sub-pixel display-sub using some sort of overlay, we
> should make a new target. Andy says display-sub code is a bit hacky.
How about a rewrite of the current one? We can do that AFTER release.
CU,
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
