Sorry, i missed your post at first:
On Thursday 05 December 2002 00:51, Christoph Egger wrote:
> BTW: What is 'sh' ? And what's the difference between mips and
> mipsel? Which powerpc it is exactly? Motorola G3 or G4? IBM PPC64?
Please see: www.de.debian.org, somewhere around 'Ports to different
archs' - PowerPC ('cause i know nothing about it ;).
> Could you send me a diff of your changes, please? Simplifies the
> inclusion for me.
Please see the bottom of my post to this list, Subject: Debian Total.
> > Other fixes to be resolved:
> >
> > configure: ac_x_include empty, no X helpers are configured. I
> > mailed Christoph a little more about the details.
>
> I think, this is a bug in debian's autoconf as I already explained
> you. Please talk with the debian's autoconf maintainer about this
> issue.
I thought about it again (and poked around a little in configure): It
shouldn't be possible! I didn't autoconf, just *use* your configure.
> > ltmain.sh: updated from 1.922.2.110 2002/10/23 01:39:54 to
> > 1.922.2.111 2002/10/23 02:54:36, looks like a joke, unfortunately
> > it isn't. With .110 either old, installed libs are linked or build
> > fails otherwise.
>
> I am still wondering, why the libtool folk still do NOT include the
> debian fixes into their CVS repository. Are debian's libtool fixes
> too specific to a shell?
Dunno, may be just missing, or lazy, or sth. else to do ...
> > glide/gtext.c and glide/visual.c both(?) need config.h.
>
> Just fixed in CVS. Can't test this, but adding an include of an
> always existing file never hurts... :)
They need it or bail out from compilation.
It does not exist when users want to rebuild examples, though.
I started to include at least flying_ggis and demo as binaries.
The other ones go wo. config.h - may be i should include this once.
> > Btw., build against glide2 or 3?
> I don't know. Sorry.
Ok, i stick to glide 2 (assuming later cards being compatible),
> Brian updated the directfb driver. I don't know, whether he updated
> it to build with directfb 0.9.13, 0.9.14 or 0.9.15.
Thanks, just updated from cvs. I give it a try.
> > ggiteleserver.[17]: I once wrote a manpage for this (now in 1,
> You may replace yours with ours. :)
Yup, seen that. Nice page, thanks, was easy now to drop mine.
> > display-x now replaces old x and xlib, display-dga is continued?
> Yes. display-dga still persists, because nobody wrote a helper
Ok, thanks.
> > Copyright: no longer LGPL? I still include a notice saying so. This
> > is important, sorry. Please clarify (for me).
>
> Demos are generally public domain.
> GGI is under the BSD license and most targets, too. Some of them may
> under the LGPL...
> We should really change everything (but the demos) to use either BSD
> _or_ LGPL. Any objections?
Just tell me then, explicitly (sorry, you might know Debian is keen on
correct copyright files).
> > lcd823: If this is usefull, it would become an arch-specific target
I made a ppc specific target pkg out of it. Description: (grind, grind)
This package contains the driver for the "lcd823" target, enabling
libGGI (and therefore any program using libGGI) to display its output
using the LCD controller of Motorola MPC823 processors.
> svgalib4ggi is lacking a maintainer. So nothing but the common GGI
> buildsystem updates has been changed.
Ok, then. I'll review existing pkgs of libggimisc and svga4libggi
possibly this weekend.
> > - libgalloc (?)
> still under development.
I see, we talk about that later then ...
Anything usefull (of lowlevel, highlevel, libs, misc, wrap'rs) released?
> cthugha? What's that?
VSOP eyecandy from music. While building it for the first time, it
wanted mesa, wasn't available, outdated libggi - hello, GGI Project!
> Tnx a lot. You are really the born packager. :-)
Tnx a lot! See above. ;-)
martin
