For what it's worth, I got these failures with sh validate --fast in HEAD this morning:
Unexpected failures: ../../libraries/directory/tests getPermissions001 [bad stdout] (normal) perf/compiler T1969 [stat too good] (normal) perf/compiler T3294 [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/compiler T4801 [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/compiler T783 [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.Cabal [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.base [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.compiler [stat too good] (normal) perf/should_run Conversions [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/should_run T4830 [stat too good] (normal) perf/should_run T5536 [stat too good] (normal) perf/should_run T7436 [stat too good] (normal) perf/should_run lazy-bs-alloc [stat too good] (normal) simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal) typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal) typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal) But then again, looking at it, I'm not sure what to do about the perf ones. Should we be more flexible in the expected result, or should I have fewer expectations about my machine being representative? And getPermissions001 might or might not have to do with the fact that this is on a virtual machine... Cheers, Pedro On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Simon Marlow <[email protected]> wrote: > These are still failing, BTW. > > Cheers, > Simon > > > On 01/02/13 14:51, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > >> yes, see earlier email on this. almost certainly my fault, will fix Monday >> >> | -----Original Message----- >> | From: [email protected] [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@** >> haskell.org <[email protected]>] On >> | Behalf Of Simon Marlow >> | Sent: 01 February 2013 08:57 >> | To: [email protected] >> | Subject: Validate failures >> | >> | A batch of testsuite failures this morning - forgotten push to >> testsuite >> | perhaps? >> | >> | Unexpected failures: >> | perf/should_run T5113 [stat not good enough] (normal) >> | simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) >> | simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) >> | simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) >> | simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) >> | typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal) >> | typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal) >> | typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal) >> | >> | Cheers, >> | Simon >> | >> | ______________________________**_________________ >> | ghc-devs mailing list >> | [email protected] >> | >> http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs> >> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs> >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
