We should really publish a blog post about this. On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Don Stewart <don...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do we get some benchmarks -- 32x better req/sec would be a good smackdown > of some recent posts floating around. > > > http://techblog.safaribooksonline.com/2013/02/22/go-as-an-alternative-to-node-js-for-very-fast-servers/ > > etc etc. > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Johan Tibell <johan.tib...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've merged the new parallel I/O manager that Andreas Voellmy and Kazu >> Yamamoto have been working on. The new parallel I/O manager scales much >> better than the current one*: the number of requests per second scales >> almost linearly up to 32 cores I believe. Perhaps Andreas could post the >> numbers. >> >> If you see any bugs that you think are related to the new I/O manager, >> please let Andreas and Kazu know. >> >> * The current one (which replaced an even earlier one) scaled well in the >> number of open file descriptors and performed better than the I/O manager >> it replaced, but it didn't scale well to multiple cores. >> >> Cheers, >> Johan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ghc-devs mailing list >> ghc-devs@haskell.org >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >> >> >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
