On 25/02/13 14:53, Gabor Greif wrote:
On 2/25/13, Simon Marlow <[email protected]> wrote:
On 24/02/13 20:40, Gabor Greif wrote:
Hi all,

from what I gathered so far no emission of write barriers is needed when
   - running on a uniprocessor (-threaded or not)
   - running on a multiprocessor sans having linked with -threaded.

Below patch suppresses the emission of 'lwsync' when no '-threaded' is
specified on PPC only. So it does not cover both criteria above.

It helps me a lot since I have a uniprocessor target that does not
understand the 'lwsync' instruction (instruction is newer than core).

Still, I have some doubts:
   o do we want to extend this approach to other archs?
   o possibly suppress the emission of MO_WriteBarrier in
compiler/codeGen/StgCmmBind.hs
      (more care is needed to also cover compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y).

Anyway this should be a safe first step, and I'd like to push it. When
we find a general solution be can back this commit out.

What do you think?

I don't think this is the right way to do it.  The -threaded flag is not
supposed to affect code generation, it only changes the RTS that gets
linked in.  That is, you can compile all your code without -threaded and
then just add -threaded at the link step, and it will work.


Hi Simon,

thanks for your review!

Instead, use conditional compilation in the RTS so that the
write_barrer() calls are only present when THREADED_RTS is on.

This is already done the way you suggest:

#define write_barrier()      /* nothing */

in includes/stg/SMP.h:368

Works perfectly, 'lwsync' only appears in .thr_*.o files.

My problem stems from another call:

     emitPrimCall [] MO_WriteBarrier []

in compiler/codeGen/StgCmmBind.hs:614

or possibly

callishMachOps = listToUFM $
         map (\(x, y) -> (mkFastString x, y)) [
         ( "write_barrier", MO_WriteBarrier ),
         ( "memcpy", MO_Memcpy ),
         ( "memset", MO_Memset ),
         ( "memmove", MO_Memmove )
         -- ToDo: the rest, maybe
     ]

in compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y:920

I doubt these files should be compiled with a dependency on
THREADED_RTS, and indeed this symbol is only ever defined
(-optc-DTHREADED_RTS) for the C compiler, and thus not available when
compiling haskell source.

So I am still stumped.

The function where "lwsync" surfaces is:

stg_marked_upd_frame_info which is rts/Updates.cmm:46.

These come from rts/Updates.h:updateWithIndirection(), which expands to some Cmm code that uses "prim %write_barrier()". So you want to use some conditional compilation to make that prim %write_barrier() disappear when THREADED_RTS is off. I suggest replacing it with write_barrier(), and then #define write_barrier() in includes/Cmm.h.

Cheers,
        Simon


This one is creating a blackhole (IISC) by means of StgCmmBind.hs:614.

How can we go on from here?

Cheers,

     Gabor




Cheers,
        Simon


Cheers,

      Gabor

$ git show c0d682fb98f32e4ce5d27ff3a30f43b6cd70733e
commit c0d682fb98f32e4ce5d27ff3a30f43b6cd70733e
Author: Gabor Greif <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri Feb 22 18:47:00 2013 +0100

      Do not emit barriers on PPC unless we go the threaded way

diff --git a/compiler/nativeGen/PPC/CodeGen.hs
b/compiler/nativeGen/PPC/CodeGen.hs
index 92eff36..6c33cca 100644
--- a/compiler/nativeGen/PPC/CodeGen.hs
+++ b/compiler/nativeGen/PPC/CodeGen.hs
@@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   --
   -- Generating machine code (instruction selection)
   --
--- (c) The University of Glasgow 1996-2004
+-- (c) The University of Glasgow 1996-2013
   --

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

@@ -906,8 +905,10 @@ genCCall'
   -}


-genCCall' _ _ (PrimTarget MO_WriteBarrier) _ _
- = return $ unitOL LWSYNC
+genCCall' dflags _ (PrimTarget MO_WriteBarrier) _ _
+ = return (if WayThreaded `elem` ways dflags
+           then unitOL LWSYNC
+           else nilOL)

   genCCall' _ _ (PrimTarget MO_Touch) _ _
    = return $ nilOL

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs





_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to