On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 05:48:12PM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > Geoff thinks that the sync-all script has code for deciding whether to add > the ".git" or not, but the code was omitted when adding the sub-module stuff. > > Result: in subsequent stuff, git looks in a darcs repo, with consequent > terribly confusing results.
Is anyone still using the darcs support in sync-all? i.e. does anyone object to me removing it? Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
