Does this help http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Compiler/NameType
Something that starts top-level may not finish up as top-level. Nested bindings are never qualified. After TidyPgm, externally-visible names (to the linker) are qualified, ones local to the .o file are not. Does it matter? Simon From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Johan Tibell Sent: 28 March 2013 20:35 To: [email protected] Subject: Why do Names defined in the current module lack a module name? Hi, I'm writing an app that uses the GHC API to extract names from modules. I've written a little AST traversal that finds all Names in the type-checked AST and writes them to a file. I noticed that every Name defined in the current module (i.e. Names generated for top-level function definitions) lack a module name i.e. nameModule_maybe return Nothing. Why is this? Should I just assume that every time nameModule_maybe return Nothing the module name is in fact the name of the current module being compiled? -- Johan
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
