Your amendment to the wiki page is very helpful. In particular, it totally supplants my suggestion about "known unexpecteds".
Thanks. On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Ian Lynagh <i...@well-typed.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:23:26AM -0500, Nicolas Frisby wrote: > > > > Question 2: Can we add another bit to unexpected results marking them as > > known/unknown? > > Unexpected results are all unknown. If they're known then they're > expected results. > > I've just written this on how to deal with validate failures not caused > by local patches: > > > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/TestingPatches#ValidatehasfailingtestswithoutanylocalpatcheswhatdoIdo > > > Question 3: What's the status on the build bot farm? > > I hope to do some work on this soon, e.g. add a way for build results to > be uploaded to the server by the builders. However, I've been spending > my time on more pressing matters recently. > > > Thanks > Ian > > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
