you have access to hardware for testing HTM? I thought haswell wasn't publicly available yet...
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Ryan Yates <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! I'll work on getting it onto the wiki soon. My next step is to > apply hardware transactions to improve STM performance. For this I will > need to collect some meaningful STM benchmarks. If anyone has some > particular use cases or code where they would like to see improved STM > performance on I would love to know. There are several potential > improvements to the existing STM performance that I will also investigate > along the way. > > Ryan > > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Ryan**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Great stuff. What you have is almost certainly more accurate, complete, >> and up to date than anything else we have, so thank you. As others have >> said, putting it on the GHC wiki would be much the best place.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Perhaps here: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Rts/STM >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Simon**** >> >> * * >> >> *Microsoft Research Limited (company number 03369488) is registered in >> England and Wales* >> >> *Registered office 21 Station Road, Cambridge, CB1 2FB *** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Yates >> *Sent:* 17 May 2013 21:06 >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Cc:* Michael L. Scott >> *Subject:* STM Commentary**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Hi all,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> For a while now I've been working on understanding GHC's STM >> implementation and I finally have something to share. I've written a >> commentary on the implementation which can be found here:**** >> >> ** ** >> >> http://fryguybob.github.io/STM-Commentary/**** >> >> ** ** >> >> The source is here:**** >> >> ** ** >> >> https://github.com/fryguybob/STM-Commentary/**** >> >> ** ** >> >> It still could use a bit of polish and I would love to hear about any >> missing details, confusion, or misunderstandings. My goal in writing this >> was to fill in the gap found here >> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Rts/STM. I happy to >> have it live where it is most appropriate. If anyone has opinions on that, >> let me know.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Any comments are welcome, it may be easiest to just comment on the source >> directly on Github, but I will, of course, take feedback in any form.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Ryan Yates**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> > > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
