> 1) We could now delete ./sync-all if this happened. In that case I would vote for replacing sync-all with a script that aids in managing branches in multiple subrepos. I implemented such a script for myself in a very ad hoc way. Having something more robust would be great.
> 2) One thing this *does* complicate is that currently, some > repositories are optional. (...) I believe this could be solved by changes in the build system, so that some components can be optional (yes, I also delete DPH to speed up building). Janek _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
