On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Carter Schonwald < [email protected]> wrote:
> So the idea here to make it possible to have a function that can be > specialized at certain types, and explicitly inlined at specific use > sites, but ghc otherwise will not inline it? Cool! > > one thought: might it be simpler to instead have something like > EXPLICIT-INLINABLE, rather that requiring the juxtaposition of two pragmas > which "seem" contradictory? > I like that idea. How about SPECIALISABLE? This is a nod to the possibility that GHC might someday automatically specialize an imported function. Or EXPOSE? Or EXTERNAL? Bikeshed activate!
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
