Re-jig done and committed.

On 2013-07-25 04:06, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Hs-boot files tend to get in the way of optimisation. Moreover,
sometimes they are truly necessary, and if there are un-necessary ones
that can greatly complicate adding necessary ones.   There are already
LOTS of data types declared as instances of Typeable at the place that
Typeable class is defined; no harm in one more.

So I'd really prefer the re-jig if that's ok

Simon

|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: Richard Eisenberg [mailto:e...@cis.upenn.edu]
|  Sent: 24 July 2013 22:37
|  To: Simon Peyton-Jones
|  Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: [commit: base] master: Implement "TypeLevelReasoning" proposal
|  at wiki:TypeLevelReasoning (365b9d8)
|
|  I agree that hs-boot files are a little inelegant, but is there a
bigger problem with
|  them? I consider instances to be more tied to a datatype definition
than the class
| definition. It may be possible (I think it is) to avoid the Proxy.hs-boot and
|  Equality.hs-boot files if we scatter their instances across the
modules. But, then
|  the "definition" of these types would be spread across a large
surface area. To me,
|  that makes the types harder to update and perhaps harder to
understand (though
|  haddock does a nice job of collecting all the instance declarations
together).
|
|  So, my thought is that the mechanism of hs-boot files may be a
little ugly, but it
|  makes the code (that is, the collection of instances) easier to
consider as a whole
|  and easier to update. That tradeoff seems worthwhile.
|
| That all said, if you (or others) feel strongly about it, I can rejigger it.
|
|  Richard
|
|  On Jul 24, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
|
|  > Richard I am deeply suspicious of all these hs-boot files.
|  >
|  > Instances should preferably go EITHER with the data type
declaration OR with
|  the class declaration.
|  >
|  > In the case of Proxy, for example, why can't the Typeable
instance for Proxy go
| in Data.Typeable.Internals? (And perhaps similarly for other instances.)
|  >
|  > Simon
|  >
|  > |  -----Original Message-----
| > | From: ghc-commits [mailto:ghc-commits-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
|  > |  Richard Eisenberg
|  > |  Sent: 24 July 2013 12:41
|  > |  To: ghc-comm...@haskell.org
| > | Subject: [commit: base] master: Implement "TypeLevelReasoning" proposal
|  at
|  > |  wiki:TypeLevelReasoning (365b9d8)
|  > |
|  > |  Repository : http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc.git/
|  > |
|  > |  On branch  : master
|  > |
|  > |
| http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/changeset/365b9d86d195dc483610a68836b4
|  > |  063656602244
|  > |
| > | >---------------------------------------------------------------
|  > |
|  > |  commit 365b9d86d195dc483610a68836b4063656602244
|  > |  Author: Richard Eisenberg <e...@cis.upenn.edu>
|  > |  Date:   Wed Jul 24 12:38:50 2013 +0100
|  > |
| > | Implement "TypeLevelReasoning" proposal at wiki:TypeLevelReasoning
|  > |
|  > |      This commit includes a propositional equality (:=:) in
Data.Type.Equality,
|  > |      a Proxy type in Data.Proxy, and has updates to Typeable.
|  > |
| > | There is an unfortunate number of hs-boot files necessary, but that | > | seems cleaner than moving Typeable instances around willy-nilly.
|  > |
|  > |   Data/Data.hs                   |    2 +-
|  > |   Data/Proxy.hs                  |  129
|  > |  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|  > |   Data/Proxy.hs-boot             |    5 ++
|  > |   Data/Type/Equality.hs          |   99
|  > |  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|  > |   Data/Type/Equality.hs-boot     |    6 ++
|  > |   Data/Typeable.hs               |   42 +++++++------
|  > |   Data/Typeable/Internal.hs      |    5 +-
|  > |   Data/Typeable/Internal.hs-boot |    3 +-
|  > |   base.cabal                     |    2 +
|  > |   9 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
|  > |
|  > |
|  > |  Diff suppressed because of size. To see it, use:
|  > |
|  > |      git show 365b9d86d195dc483610a68836b4063656602244
|  > |
|  > |  _______________________________________________
|  > |  ghc-commits mailing list
|  > |  ghc-comm...@haskell.org
|  > |  http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-commits
|  >
|  >
|  >
|


_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to