I'm not really concerned that tests improved, but I wonder whether this improvement was caused by recent fix for #8083 pushed by Simon Marlow. Given performance changes I reported in #8082 I simply wonder how sensitive is the code generation. I observed one case where performance improves by 20% just by accident. Perhaps this would be another such case?
Janek ----- Oryginalna wiadomość ----- Od: "Simon Peyton-Jones" <simo...@microsoft.com> Do: "Jan Stolarek" <jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl>, "ghc-devs" <ghc-devs@haskell.org> Wysłane: piątek, 26 lipiec 2013 16:57:23 Temat: RE: T5321FD and T5321Fun performance improvements If no one remembers, just accept the new values! | -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Jan Stolarek | Sent: 26 July 2013 15:57 | To: ghc-devs | Subject: T5321FD and T5321Fun performance improvements | | T5321FD and T5321Fun are failing with HEAD - performance stat is too good. | Looks like the allocation has decreased. Did anyone notice when this improvement | happened? | | Janek | | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
